MINUMLAH JUS DURIAN BELANDA ASLI DI LEBIH 500 RESTORAN SEKITAR SELANGOR, KL, IPOH, SG. PETANI, MELAKA....PASTIKAN PRODUK ASLI DENGAN JENAMA PURIASLI, sesiapa yg berminat utk membekal kepada restoran di kawasan anda sila hubungi kami, dijamin pendapatan boleh mencecah RM5K sebulan sila hubungi 0182001100






Monday, 10 December 2012


Alhamdulillah...sudah hampir 1 tahun saya memasarkan produk Puri durian belanda ini. Ramai yg memandang sinis juga berteka teki bolehkah puri ini dipasarkan? Malah pengalaman saya memasarkan produk puri durian belanda ini ada yg sehingga menyatakan "boleh mati minum jus durian belanda ni! " sedih pun ada setelah rugi berpuluh ribu sebelum mendapat tune yg betul bagi memasarkan puri durian belanda ni..tetiba ada yg buat statement mcm tu....alhamdulillah restoran yg buat kenyataan mcm tuh..sekarang ni ambil 10kg puri durian belanda seminggu..besttt!

Puri durian belanda keluaran Puri Asli Resources

Sekarang ini anda boleh minum jus asli durian belanda hampir di semua restoran terpilih di lembah kelang.....alhamdulillah pasaran juga semakin meluas sekarang, boleh juga didapati di Sungai Petani, Ipoh, Melaka, Kota Bharu.

Selepas setahun, permintaan terhadap Puri durian belanda sangat hebat...sampai tak cukup stok kekadang nak support permintaan, tetapi yg paling menggembirakan saya,, ramai pengidap kanser yg telah menggunakan puri durian belanda keluaran Puri Asli ini yg menyatakan kadar tumor semakin menurun, yg dah baik pun ada...ada satu kes tu yg setiap minggu datang minum di kedai pelanggan kami, setelah 4 bulan, beliau menyatakan kansernya sudah sembuh..alhamdulillah hanya Allah sahaja yg mengetahui.

Kesempatan ini saya ingin mengajak pembaca yg berminat untuk mengedarkan Puri Durian Belanda ini di kawasan anda. Keuntungan yg sangat tinggi dan yg paling penting kadar repeat order yg sangat cepat dan berterusan. Berapa pendapatan boleh dapat sebulan? Insyallah kalau ikut formula dan kaedah yg telah kami rancangkan, pengedar boleh mendapat pendapatan RM4,000 ke atas dalam masa sebulan.

Sesiapa yg berminat boleh hubungi talian 013-3177012

Wednesday, 7 December 2011


Did you know that soursop can prevent UTI? Find out what this exotic spiky fruit is loaded with that can help prevent this infection including the other health promoting goodness it has to offer.
If you haven’t tasted soursop, then you don’t know what you’re missing. Its heart-shaped green spiky exterior may probably don’t look appetizing. But when you eat its luscious creamy white flesh, your taste buds will feast on the delicious combination of strawberry and pineapple with sour citrus notes contrasting with an underlying rich flavor reminiscent of coconut or banana. In the Philippines, it is believed to be good against internal parasites. But whether it’s effective or not, the many nutrients its loaded with has so many health promoting goodness to offer.

For every cup (225 g) of pulp, here’s how nutritious it is.
1.       Prevents UTI (Vitamin C-77% DV)
Soursop is an excellent source of vitamin C, a nutrient which increases the acidity level of urine, resulting in decreased number of harmful bacteria that may be present in the urinary tract. Other high vitamin C fruits include guava, kiwifruit, papaya and strawberries.
2.       Prevents constipation (Fiber-30% DV)
Go natural! Let this fruit’s rich fiber content be the solution to problems in bowel movement.
3.       Prevents leg cramps (Potassium-18% DV)
It contains half the potassium in bananas. Lack of potassium, together with magnesium, calcium and sodium (also known as electrolytes) in the body can cause muscle weakness and cramping.
4.       Prevents water retention (Magnesium-12% DV)
Women who experience water retention before their monthly period would benefit from the soursop’s rich magnesium content. It may help alleviate this annoying premenstrual symptom.
5.       Helps the body produce energy (Thiamin-11% DV)
Feeling a little tired? Eat soursop! It can supply the body a good amount of thiamin, the B vitamin which is needed in aerobic energy production, the process when oxygen is used to help convert sugar into usable energy.
6.       Keeps bones healthy (Copper-10% DV)
It is loaded with the trace mineral copper. Calcium contributes only about 25% to the prevention of bone loss as magnesium, manganese, zinc and copper are also equally crucial for healthy bones. Zinc and copper boost the effectiveness of vitamin D, which promotes the absorption of calcium.
7.       Boosts good cholesterol levels (Niacin-10%)
Worried about your cholesterol? Fresh fruits and veggies are the perfect choice! Soursop is a good source of niacin, a vitamin which studies show has significant benefits on levels of HDL, the good cholesterol
8.       Prevents pregnancy complications (Folate-8% DV)
This spiky fruit contains folate. Studies have proven that folate intake during pregnancy prevents deficiency in pregnant women. A lack of this mineral during pregnancy may contribute to birth defects and pregnancy loss.
9.       Helps prevent anemia (Iron-8% DV)
It can provide iron which prevents the common blood disorder anemia – a condition in which the blood lacks enough healthy red blood cells. RBC is responsible for the distribution of oxygen to the body tissues, giving the body energy.
10.   Helps prevent migraines (Riboflavin-7% DV)
Headache? Try soursop! It has riboflavin. Several studies have shown that high riboflavin intake helps prevent migraines.

* Nutrient data source: USDA

Most Cancer Patients Die of Chemotherapy

Written by Andreas Moritz, July 23, 2008 

Former White House press secretary Tony Snow died in July 2008 at the age of 53, following a series of chemotherapy treatments for colon cancer. In 2005, Snow had his colon removed and underwent six months of chemotherapy after being diagnosed with colon cancer. Two years later (2007), Snow underwent surgery to remove a growth in his abdominal area, near the site of the original cancer. “This is a very treatable condition,” said Dr. Allyson Ocean, a gastrointestinal oncologist at Weill Cornell Medical College. “Many patients, because of the therapies we have, are able to work and live full lives with quality while they're being treated. Anyone who looks at this as a death sentence is wrong.” But of course we now know, Dr. Ocean was dead wrong.

The media headlines proclaimed Snow died from colon cancer, although they knew he didn’t have a colon anymore. Apparently, the malignant cancer had “returned” (from where?) and “spread” to the liver and elsewhere in his body. In actual fact, the colon surgery severely restricted his normal eliminative functions, thereby overburdening the liver and tissue fluids with toxic waste. The previous series of chemo-treatments inflamed and irreversibly damaged a large number of cells in his body, and also impaired his immune system -- a perfect recipe for growing new cancers. Now unable to heal the causes of the original cancer (in addition to the newly created ones), Snow’s body developed new cancers in the liver and other parts of the body.

The mainstream media, of course, still insist Snow died from colon cancer, thus perpetuating the myth that it is only the cancer that kills people, not the treatment. Nobody seems to raise the important point that it is extremely difficult for a cancer patient to actually heal from this condition while being subjected to the systemic poisons of chemotherapy and deadly radiation. If you are bitten by a poisonous snake and don’t get an antidote for it, isn’t it likely that your body becomes overwhelmed by the poison and, therefore, cannot function anymore?

Before Tony Snow began his chemo-treatments for his second colon cancer, he still looked healthy and strong. But after a few weeks into his treatment, he started to develop a coarse voice, looked frail, turned gray and lost his hair. Did the cancer do all this to him? Certainly not. Cancer doesn’t do such a thing, but chemical poisoning does. He actually looked more ill than someone who has been bitten by a poisonous snake.

Does the mainstream media ever report about the overwhelming scientific evidence that shows chemotherapy has zero benefits in the five-year survival rate of colon cancer patients? Or how many oncologists stand up for their cancer patients and protect them against chemotherapy treatment which they very well know can cause them to die far more quickly than if they received no treatment at all? Can you trustingly place your life into their hands when you know that most of them would not even consider chemotherapy for themselves if they were diagnosed with cancer? What do they know that you don't? The news is spreading fast that in the United States physician-caused fatalities now exceed 750,000 each year. Perhaps, many doctors no longer trust in what they practice, for good reasons.

“Most cancer patients in this country die of chemotherapy... Chemotherapy does not eliminate breast, colon or lung cancers. This fact has been documented for over a decade. Yet doctors still use chemotherapy for these tumors... Women with breast cancer are likely to die faster with chemo than without it.” - Alan Levin, M.D.

An investigation by the Department of Radiation Oncology, Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Australia, into the contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival in 22 major adult malignancies, showed startling results: The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.” [Royal North Shore Hospital Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2005 Jun;17(4):294.]

The research covered data from the Cancer Registry in Australia and the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results in the USA for the year 1998. The current 5-year relative adult survival rate for cancer in Australia is over 60%, and no less than that in the USA. By comparison, a mere 2.3% contribution of chemotherapy to cancer survival does not justify the massive expense involved and the tremendous suffering patients experience because of severe, toxic side effects resulting from this treatment. With a meager success rate of 2.3%, selling chemotherapy as a medical treatment (instead of a scam), is one of the greatest fraudulent acts ever committed. The average chemotherapy earns the medical establishment a whopping $300,000 to $1,000,000 each year, and has so far earned those who promote this pseudo-medication (poison) over 1 trillion dollars. It’s no surprise that the medical establishment tries to keep this scam alive for as long as possible.

In 1990, the highly respected German epidemiologist, Dr. Ulrich Abel from the Tumor Clinic of the University of Heidelberg, conducted the most comprehensive investigation of every major clinical study on chemotherapy drugs ever done. Abel contacted 350 medical centers and asked them to send him anything they had ever published on chemotherapy. He also reviewed and analyzed thousands of scientific articles published in the most prestigious medical journals. It took Abel several years to collect and evaluate the data. Abel’s epidemiological study, which was published on August 10, 1991 in The Lancet, should have alerted every doctor and cancer patient about the risks of one of the most common treatments used for cancer and other diseases. In his paper, Abel came to the conclusion that the overall success rate of chemotherapy was “appalling.” According to this report, there was no scientific evidence available in any existing study to show that chemotherapy can “extend in any appreciable way the lives of patients suffering from the most common organic cancers.”

Abel points out that chemotherapy rarely improves the quality of life. He describes chemotherapy as “a scientific wasteland” and states that even though there is no scientific evidence that chemotherapy works, neither doctor nor patient is willing to give up on it. The mainstream media has never reported on this hugely important study, which is hardly surprising, given the enormous vested interests of the groups that sponsor the media, that is, the pharmaceutical companies. A recent search turned up exactly zero reviews of Abel’s work in American journals, even though it was published in 1990. I believe this is not because his work was unimportant -- but because it is irrefutable.

The truth of the matter would be far too costly for the pharmaceutical industry to bear, thus making it unacceptable. If the mass media reported the truth that medical drugs, including chemotherapy drugs, are used to practically commit genocide in the U.S. and the world, their best sponsors (the pharmaceutical companies) would have to withdraw their misleading advertisements from the television media, radio stations, magazines, and newspapers. But neither group wants to go bankrupt.

Many doctors go as far as prescribing chemotherapy drugs to patients for malignancies that are far too advanced for surgery, with the full knowledge that there are no benefits at all. Yet they claim chemotherapy to be an effective cancer treatment, and their unsuspecting patients believe that “effective” equals “cure.” The doctors, of course, refer to the FDA’s definition of an “effective” drug, one which achieves a 50% or more reduction in tumor size for 28 days. They neglect to tell their patients that there is no correlation whatsoever between shrinking tumors for 28 days and curing the cancer or extending life. Temporary tumor shrinkage through chemotherapy has never been shown to cure cancer or to extend life. In other words, you can live with an untreated tumor for just as long as you would with one that has been shrunken or been eliminated by chemotherapy (or radiation).

Chemotherapy has never been shown to have curative effects for cancer. By contrast, the body can still cure itself, which it actually tries to do by developing cancer. Cancer is more a healing response than it is a disease. The “disease” is the body’s attempt to cure itself of an existing imbalance. And sometimes, this healing response continues even if a person is subjected to chemotherapy (and/or radiation). Unfortunately, as the previously mentioned research has demonstrated, the chances for a real cure are greatly reduced when patients are treated with chemotherapy drugs.

The side effects of the treatment can be horrendous and heartbreaking for both patients and their loved ones, all in the name of trustworthy medical treatment. Although the drug treatment comes with the promise to improve the patient’s quality of life, it is just common sense that a drug that makes them throw up and lose their hair, while wrecking their immune system, is doing the exact opposite. Chemo-therapy can give the patient life-threatening mouth sores. It attacks the immune system by destroying billions of immune cells (white blood cells). Its deadly poisons inflame every part of the body. The drugs can slough off the entire lining of their intestines. The most common side effect experienced among chemo patients is their complete lack of energy. The new additional drugs now given to many chemo patients may prevent the patient from noticing some of the side effects, but they hardly reduce the immensely destructive and suppressive effect of the chemotherapy itself. Remember, the reason chemotherapy can shrink some tumors is because it causes massive destruction in the body.

If you have cancer, you may think that feeling tired is just part of the disease. This rarely is the case. Feeling unusually tired is more likely due to anemia, a common side effect of most chemotherapy drugs. Chemo drugs can dramatically decrease your red blood cell levels, and this reduces oxygen availability to the 60-100 trillion cells of your body. You can literally feel the energy being zapped from every cell of your body -- a physical death without dying. Chemo-caused fatigue has a negative impact on day-to-day activities in 89% of all patients. With no energy, there can be no joy and no hope, and all bodily functions become subdued.

One long-term side effect is that these patients' bodies can no longer respond to nutritional or immune-strengthening approaches to cancerous tumors. All of this may explain why cancer patients who do not receive any treatment at all, have an up to four times higher remission rate than those who receive treatment. The sad thing is that chemotherapy does not cure 96% to 98% of all cancers anyway. Conclusive evidence (for the majority of cancers) that chemotherapy has any positive influence on survival or quality of life does not exist.

To promote chemotherapy as a treatment for cancer is misleading, to say the least. By permanently damaging the body’s immune system and other important parts, chemo-therapy has become a leading cause of treatment-caused diseases such as heart disease, liver disease, intestinal diseases, diseases of the immune system, infections, brain diseases, pain disorders, and rapid aging.

Before committing themselves to being poisoned, cancer patients need to question their doctors and ask them to produce the research or evidence that shrinking a tumor actually translates to any increase in survival. If they tell you that chemotherapy is your best chance of surviving, you will know they are lying or are simply misinformed. As Abel’s research clearly demonstrated, there is no such evidence anywhere to be found in the medical literature. Subjecting patients to chemotherapy robs them of a fair chance of finding or responding to a real cure and deserves criminal prosecution.

Monday, 26 September 2011


Terima kasih kerana mengunjungi blog ini, semoga kita dapat sama-sama berkongsi maklumat tentang kebaikan buah durian belanda ini dan kemampuanya melawan kanser. 

berikut adalah beberapa petikan yg saya ingin kongsikan bersama anda hasil dari bacaan saya dari beberapa jurnal kesihatan serta laporan kajian saintifik dunia.

" Many bioactive compounds and phytochemicals have been found in graviola, as scientists have been studying its properties since the 1940s. Its many uses in natural medicine have been validated by scientific research. Several studies by different researchers demonstrated that the bark as well as the leaves had hypotensive, antispasmodic, anticonvulsant, vasodilator, smoothmuscle relaxant, and cardiodepressant activities in animals. Researchers verified graviola leaf's hypotensive properties in rats again in 199 Several studies over the years have demonstrated that leaf, bark, root, stem, fruit and seed extracts of graviola are antibacterial in vitro against numerous pathogens and that the bark has antifungal properties.Graviola seeds demonstrated active antiparasitic properties in a 1991 study and a leaf extract showed to be active against malaria in two other studies (in 1990 and 1993).The leaves, root, and seeds of graviola demonstrated insecticidal properties, with the seeds demonstrating strong insecticidal activity in an early 1940 study. In a 1997 clinical study, novel alkaloids found in graviola fruit exhibited antidepressive effects in animals. "

"In an 1976 plant screening program by the National Cancer Institute, graviola leaves and stem showed active cytotoxicity against cancer cells and researchers have been following up on these findings since. Much of the cancer research on graviola focuses on a novel set of phytochemicals called Annonaceous acetogenins. Graviola produces these natural compounds in its leaf and stem, bark, and fruit seeds. Three separate research groups have isolated these acetogenin compounds in graviola which have demonstrated significant antitumorous and anticancerous properties, and selective toxicity against various types of cancer cells (without harming healthy cells) publishing eight clinical studies on their findings.14–21 Many of the acetogenins have demonstrated selective toxicity to tumor cells at very low dosages—as little as
1 part per million. Four studies were published in 1998 which further specify phytochemicals and
acetogenins which are demonstrating the strongest anticancerous, antitumorous, and antiviral properties.Thus far, specific acetogenins in graviola have been reported to be selectively toxic to these types of tumor cells: lung carcinoma cell lines;14,16–19 human breast solid tumor lines;prostate adenocarcinoma; pancreatic carcinoma cell lines; colon adenocarcinoma cell lines;liver cancer cell lines;human lymphoma cell lines; and multi-drug resistant human breast adenocarcinoma.

Annonaceous acetogenins are only found in the Annonaceae family (to which graviola belongs). In general, various Annonaceous acetogenins in the plant family have been documented with antitumorous, antiparasitic, pesticidal, antiprotozoal, antifeedant, anthelmintic, and antimicrobial
activities. Mode of action studies in three separate laboratories have recently determined that
these acetogenins are superb inhibitors of enzyme processes that are only found in the membranes of cancerous tumor cells. 

Purdue University, in West Lafayette, Indiana, has conducted a great deal of the research on the acetogenins, much of which has been funded by The National Cancer Institute and/or the National Institute of Health (NIH). Thus far, Purdue University and/or its staff have filed at least nine U.S. and/or international patents on their work around the antitumorous and insecticidal properties and uses of these acetogenins. In one of their reviews, titled “Recent Advances in Annonaceous Acetogenins,” they state, “Recently, we reported that the Annonaceous acetogenins can selectively inhibit the growth of cancerous cells and also inhibit the growth of 
\adriamycin resistant tumor cells. As more acetogenins have been isolated and additional
cytotoxicity assays have been conducted, we have noticed that, although most of acetogenins have
high potencies among several solid human tumor cell lines, some of the derivatives within the different structural types and some positional isomers showed remarkable selectivities among certain cell lines; e.g., against prostate cancer (PC-3). We now understand the primary modes of action for the acetogenins. They are potent inhibitors of NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase, which is in an essential enzyme in complex I leading to oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria.

A recent report showed that they act directly at the ubiquinone-catalytic site(s) within complex I and in microbial glucose dehydrogenase. They also inhibit the ubiquinone-linked NADH oxidase that is peculiar to the plasma membranes of cancerous cells.

In 1997, Purdue University published information with promising news that several of the Annonaceous acetogenins " . . . not only are effective in killing tumors that have proven resistant to anti-cancer agents, but also seem to have a special affinity for such resistant cells. In several interviews after this information was publicized, the head pharmacologist in Purdue's research explained how this worked. As he explains it, cancer cells that survive chemotherapy can develop resistance to the agent originally used as well as to other, even unrelated, drugs. This phenomenon is called multi-drug resistance (MDR). One of the ways that cancer cells develop resistance to chemotherapy drugs is by creating an intercellular efflux pump called a P-glycoprotein mediated pump. These types of pumps are capable of pushing anticancer agents out of the cell before they can kill it. On average, only about two percent of the cancer cells in any given person might develop this pump—but they are the two percent that can eventually grow and expand to create multi-drug.....

to be continued...please visit again

Thursday, 15 September 2011

Graviola Actions :

Attack cancer safely and effectively with an all-natural therapy that does not cause extreme nausea, weight loss and hair loss

Protect your immune system and avoid deadly infections

Feel stronger and healthier throughout the course of the treatment

Boost your energy and improve your outlook on life

Stimulate and Support the Immune Defense System

Slow down or Stop the Production of ATP in Mitochondria of Abnormal Cells.

Natural Killer MDR(Multi-Drug Resistant) Cancer Cells without the side effects of Chemical Drugs.

Strengthen the Digestive System and Maintain intestinal environment.

Boost and Enhance the Energy and the Blood Circulation.

Purify the Body of Toxins.

Support the Body in Healing itself.

Support for Lymphatic System.

Tuesday, 2 August 2011


Sepanjang tempoh saya memasarkan Produk Puri Durian Belanda ini, saya selalu di hujani soalan MENGAPA PURI? mengapa tidak dikekalkan dalam bentuk asal atau hanya isi berbentuk ulas2 isi durian belanda.

Untuk pengetahuan semua, pihak kami bukanlah baru didalam menguruskan buah durian belanda ini. kami adalah pengimport buah durian belanda yg paling besar ( jika diukur dari volume ) 

Kami membekalkan buah durian belanda segar ini ke pasaraya2 besar di Malaysia dan juga pemborong2 di seluruh semenanjung Malaysia. 

Sepanjang pegalamam kami menguruskan buah ini, kami dapati adalah amat sukar untuk menguruskan buah ini kerana ia mengeluarkan kadar gas Ethylene yg tinggi. Pengeluaran gas ini menyebabkan buah masak dengan cepat dan kesegaran fizikal buah tidak dapat dikekalkan pada tempoh yg lebih lama.

Bagi mengatasi masalah ini kami membuat keputusan untuk mengimport buah ini dari negara asal tanpa kulit (skinless) dan memprosesnya menjadi bentuk puri. Puri ini dipilih kerana pengguna akan dapat merasa  buah yg sebenar bagi tujuan kesihatan serta faedah buah ini.

Ada juga yg mencadangkan agar hanya mengasingkan ulas2 buah durian ini dan disimpan di dalam bekas. Persoalanya jika dibuat di dalam bentuk ini, isi buah itu perlu diawetkan supaya ianya tahan lebih lama. Maka dengan itu isi buah ini perlu dicampurkan dengan air, bahan pengawet, bahan kimia serta gula. Gula digunakan bagi mengurangkan rasa bahan pengawet yg digunakan.
Inilah yg dimaksudkan isi / ulas bersama biji

Jadi pihak kami tidak bersetuju isi durian belanda ini dikekalkan dalam bentuk yg asli, kerana ianya akan nampak asli tapi tidak lagi berfungsi sebagai makanan/minuman kesihatan kepada pengguna. Maka matilah fungsinya sebagai melawan kanser.  Kandungan gula yg tinggi digunakan akan menyebabkan kesan yg lebih buruk kepada pesakit kanser serta pesakit kencing manis.

Puree / Puri ini pula jika dilihat tidak lagi dalam bentuk fizikal nya yg asal, ia telah dihancurkan , dikisar, dibuang bijinya. Tetapi ini dilakukan bagi memastikan isi ini dapat melalui proses steril yg dilakukan tanpa perlu dicampur dengan gula. Tahap khasiat buah ini dapat dikekalkan 100%, tanpa campuran gula, pengguna boleh memakan puree ini begitu sahaja atau juga boleh dibuat jus, hanya campurkan 2-3 sudu ke dalam gelas bersama air, siap untuk diminum.

Namun harus diingat puree ini harus dikekalkan didalam freezer bagi memastikan tahap ketahanannya.

Ini adalah bentuk buah skinless yg dibawa masuk dari negara asal
Jadi pihak kami amat berharap yg kami dapat memberikan maklumat sebenar serta pengetahuan kepada pengguna. Jadilah pengguna yg bijak, kerana anda berhak memilih yg terbaik untuk diri anda!

Sunday, 17 July 2011

A story about Cancer & Soursop

Source from: The Health Science Institute, America

These are few success story about people who experienced fighting cancer with Graviola (Soursop/sirsak/Durian Belanda)

Doctors said his situation was hopeless. How many times have we heard that one?

In an Health Science Institute (HSI) Forum thread titled “Graviola progress report,” an HSI member named Bob tells how he took charge of the cancer treatment for his father-in-law after the doctors threw in the towel. Bob writes: “Month’s ago my Father-in-law was diagnosed with cancer. It was too late for chemo or radiation. 86 years old, the Doctors basically said ‘go home and die.’ Everyone (except me) accepted the inevitable. I purchased Graviola powder from Equadorian products (intotherainforest.com) put the powder into the smallest capsules, and explained to him that if this works, his wife and none of his kids will ever have to go through what he’s going through.
“I prescribed 1 in the morning and 1 at night for the first week, then have the nurse check the blood pressure (Graviola’s side effect). If no change then go to 2 in the morning and 2 at night for a week and have the nurse check blood pressure, continue the pattern of increase until he reaches 6 in the morning and 6 at night (The highest level recommended by my studies). First he began to hold down food. Eventually he started sleeping less.”
And now? This man who was sent home to die “is keeping busy in the garden.”
In the e-Alert “Giving and Taking Care” (Thursday, 9/16/04 – see below), I told you about an HSI member named Mary who also had very positive results using graviola to care for her father who had lung cancer. And with more than 25 individual threads about graviola on the Forum, it would seem that quite a few HSI members have found out about this remarkable cancer-fighting botanical.